Vertical Leap Search Engine Marketing Blog - Details

Link Details

Blog Directory : Listing Details

Vertical Leap Search Engine Marketing Blog details

Listing ID: 773

Title: Vertical Leap Search Engine Marketing Blog

Description: Commentary, thoughts and analysis on drawing attention to search engine marketing related resources, techniques and skills.

CategoryInternet : Search Engine Marketing

Owner: Matt Hopkins

listed on: May 28, 2008 05:55:52 AM

Number Hits: 0 times

Address: Customs House, 10 Hampshire Terrace, Portsmouth, Hampshire

City: Hampshire

State: Hampshire

Zip Code: PO1 2QF

Phone Number: 4408451232753

Map:

Recent Posts:

Pay Per Click - Quality not Quantity - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:47:55 GMT

Recently I posted a blog on the new Google Quality Score feature in Adwords. This new system did away with the old style, where by agencies and users had to pretty much guess what state their adwords campaigns were in and what the quality was by using logic and testing within the campaigns, retrieving data and acting upon it. Google promised a new easy to use Quality Score algorithm........

As I predicted and mentioned in my last post the new system was riddled with teething problems and needed time to bed in properly. This had stirred up the PPC Companies and posts of errors and problems came flooding in. 

Hooray the uneasy storm has now past and the calm of a Quality new era begins.....

The new algorithms that have been put into place mean that advertisers will now be given opportunity to move up position rankings in the sponsored links without paying above the odds for the privilege. Google will determine the relevancy and quality of ads an decide where best to place them. Previously impressions and CTR's played the majority part in deciding an ads Quality Score, this however meant that the usual top spot ads received the greatest number of clicks and therefore much higher Quality Scores. Leaving other advertisers bidding for the remaining slots. This function seems to be one step closer to their goal of only showing the most targeted of ads on 1 page.

This has also led to a change in the way Google choose ads for the coloured sponsored search bar at the top of the page. Before now the ads sitting at the top of the page were the only ones who could be moved up into this much sort after position providing they meet the quality benchmarks of relevancy etc. Now the new system can see those ads in lower positions leapfrog these big guns for having better Q'S. Google are rewarding competently built and targeted campaigns over and above the big money bidders. Is the playing field finally leveling as previously shouted about??


What to do?

Well the answer is the same as before keep ads relevant. Make sure that keywords are separated into the most granular of ad groups possible, and keep everything as tight as you can. This may mean test and test again to reach your optimum goal but in the end its your pocket that will benefit from the hard work. Many PPC Companies who are happy to sit back on old campaigns will feel the hit harder and see positions dropped only to be replaced by someone only spending £10 per day. So use your history reports to help and start to climb up that sponsored ladder to success.

 



David Thomas
PPC Campaign Delivery Manager

What country specific content? - Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:05:07 GMT

It's the first time I noticed it, although it's probably been there forever- the humble watermark that sits in the search box on the Google Analytics Support page:

search box

It indicates the language that you are likely to be searching with, using the "custom search".

What's odd is that when I've logged out of Analytics the search box contains a Cyrillic alphabet watermark:
cyrillic watermark

Before I log in it displays a UK one:
UK watermark

What's odder is that the URL of the Cyrillic one is:
http://www.google.com/coop/intl/uk/images/google_custom_search_watermark.gif
and the UK one's is:
http://www.google.com/coop/intl/en/images/google_custom_search_watermark.gif
...the only difference is the country identifier being replaced with a language identifier (uk or en).

I'd love to know to how or why this happens. Of more interest to me is whether it is a reflection of, or a hint at, how truly difficult it is to serve country-specific content.



Joe Bursell
Campaign Delivery Manager

Search Engine Optimisation Means Different Things to Different People - Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:13:31 GMT
As an SEO company, Vertical Leap spends a lot of its time explaining the processes we use and monitoring the effects that our efforts have on the traffic and rankings for our websites.

We also monitor the blogs and websites for information of interest to us. We read a lot of information on a daily basis, some of which we agree with and some of which we don’t. We filter the information in the blogosphere past our own experiences and evaluate it. With a hundred or so clients we have a lot of data to check other people’s hunches about the way that search results are changing.

So it was with great interest that yesterday, I read two items of interest. One was a summary of Bruce Clay’s PubCon presentation, and the other was Google’s Release of their SEO Starter Guide.

The focus of Bruce Clay’s presentation was the evolution of SEO in 2009 (including forecasting the death of rankings again). Predicting the future is always difficult and he’s made a reasonable extrapolation of what could happen.

Google’s foray into the future of SEO is interesting too. Whilst there has always been a tacit acknowledgement of SEO, their published information was a little thin on the ground e.g. this page which mainly seems to warn people against SEO companies :-) I’m not counting Matt Cutt’s blog here, because it is technically independent.

What this meant was that people were aware of search engine optimisation, but then turned to other sources to get the ‘how to’ information. This has caused a few problems along the way because of the fluid nature of the internet – what worked for SEO in 2003 might not be appropriate (even dangerous) today.

So it was with great interest that I read through the document that Google has provided. From a SEO professional’s point of view, it may be a little superficial in places (yes, we all know that title tags are important, but the order of words matters too), but for many webmasters even this level of information could be a revelation.

So we have two very contrasting views on SEO – one is the high level professional view all about the changing landscape and how we will all be changing the way we work in the future. The other is Google’s back to basics viewpoint which I think illustrates that they still think that the majority of sites have a long way to go to be truly “search engine friendly”.

Dealing with lots of sites on a daily basis, when reading these I can appreciate both are valid interpretations of what SEO is, but the underlying message of the two is quite different. This demonstrates that SEO doesn’t quite mean the same thing to everyone.

Kerry Dye
Campaign Delivery Manager